Kia RIO 2003 vs Seat Cordoba 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 64 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 125 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.7 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 5 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 485 litres | |
|
Seat Cordoba has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 159 litres less trunk space than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.1 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |