Kia RIO 2003 vs Kia RIO 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 97 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 125 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.7 - 7.2 | |
|
Kia RIO 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia RIO 2003 is 24 cm longer than the Kia RIO 2005, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO 2003 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 272 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1107 litres | |
|
Kia RIO 2003 has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO 2003 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO 2003 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia RIO 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia RIO has
| |