Kia RIO 2003 vs Honda Civic 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.1 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.6 - 7.1 | |
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.23 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 26 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 159 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.5 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`679 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Honda Civic has
| |