Kia RIO 2003 vs Dacia Logan 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kia RIO is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dacia Logan is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 108 HP | 68 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 140 NM | 112 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 10 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.7 - 7.2 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dacia Logan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 2 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 510 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 184 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`493 | ~ 1`569 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |