Kia RIO 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 108 HP | 50 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 140 NM | 84 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.7 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but slightly lower. Kia RIO is 26 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 499 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 239 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`579 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |