Kia RIO 2000 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 108 HP | 65 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 140 NM | 114 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 8.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.7 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 6 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 499 litres | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1210 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 151 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 67 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Renault Megane has
| |