Kia RIO 2000 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 108 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 140 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.7 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 37 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 499 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
| Kia RIO has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`671 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |