Kia RIO 2000 vs Rover 45 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 108 HP | 100 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 140 NM | 123 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.3 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.7 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
|
On average, the Kia RIO petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Rover 45. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller, but higher. Kia RIO is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 45, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 499 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 717 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 119 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The Rover 45 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.9 metres less than that of the Rover 45, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`468 | ~ 1`681 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Rover 45 has
| |