Kia RIO 2003 vs Seat Toledo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 102 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 148 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 8.5 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 5.5 - 9.1 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 22 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 51 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.4 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |