Kia RIO 2003 vs Peugeot 206 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 60 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 94 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 7.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but slightly lower. Kia RIO is 42 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 1070 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 621 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`514 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |