Kia RIO 2003 vs Suzuki Liana 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia RIO
2003 - 2005
Suzuki Liana
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Kia RIO is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Liana can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.3 - 1.51.3 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 82 - 97 HP90 - 106 HP
Torque: 116 - 132 NM116 - 144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 - 14.3 seconds11.7 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 8.36.7 - 8.2
On average, the Kia RIO petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Suzuki Liana.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.24 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.55 m
Kia RIO and Suzuki Liana are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 449 litres348 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1277 litres1149 litres
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity.
Kia RIO has 101 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 128 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.5 metres less than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`503~ 1`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Kia RIO has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Suzuki Liana has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv