Kia RIO 2003 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Kia RIO is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Liana can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 90 - 106 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 116 - 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 11.7 - 13.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 6.7 - 8.2 | |
On average, the Kia RIO petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Suzuki Liana. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.55 m | |
Kia RIO and Suzuki Liana are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 348 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1149 litres | |
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 101 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 128 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.5 metres less than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |