Kia RIO 2003 vs Mazda 323 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 75 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 9.7 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 5.8 - 9.2 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1000 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 94 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. The Mazda 323 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 323, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |