Kia RIO 2003 vs Hyundai Accent 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 82 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 117 - 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 10.3 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 5.5 - 8.0 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Accent. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Accent, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | 321 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 859 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 128 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Accent. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 418 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Accent, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Hyundai Accent has
| |