Kia RIO 2003 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 97 HP | 80 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 132 NM | 114 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | 8.9 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.3 | 5.4 - 9.8 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Stilo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 449 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 1.6 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Kia RIO can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`503 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |