Kia RIO 2011 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 42 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |