Kia RIO 2011 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but slightly lower. Kia RIO is 45 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 13 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 88 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |