Kia RIO 2017 vs Citroen C4 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 123 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 151 NM | 150 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.9 seconds | 8.1 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 6.6 | 4.8 - 7.1 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller. Kia RIO is 23 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 443 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 37 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The Citroen C4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |