Kia RIO 2017 vs Mazda 2 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 77 - 123 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 122 - 240 NM | 135 - 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14 seconds | 8.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.8 | 3.4 - 4.9 | |
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Kia RIO is larger, but slightly lower. Kia RIO is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 950 litres | |
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Kia RIO has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia RIO (by 30 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`614 | ~ 1`525 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |