Kia Pregio 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Pregio engine produces 69 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Pregio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.75 m | |
| Kia Pregio is 9 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Pregio is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |