Kia Pregio 2003 vs Kia Carnival 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 144 HP | |
Torque: | 227 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Kia Pregio engine produces 64 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Kia Pregio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Carnival) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Pregio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.98 m | 1.74 m | |
Kia Pregio is smaller, but higher. Kia Pregio is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Pregio is 25 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 302 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`665 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Pregio has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |