Kia Picanto 2011 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Picanto consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 26 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | no data | |
| Kia Picanto has 4 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |