Kia Picanto 2011 vs Toyota Aygo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Kia Picanto engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Despite the higher power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.5 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Picanto consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 18 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
605 litres | 782 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 61 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`340 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 880 kg | 805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 385 kg | |
| Kia Picanto load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Toyota Aygo. Therefore, Kia Picanto is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests, but Toyota Aygo is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Picanto, so Toyota Aygo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |