Kia Picanto 2015 vs Hyundai i20 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i20 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 54 HP less power than Hyundai i20, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Hyundai i20. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai i10 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai Kona | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Picanto is 44 cm shorter than the Hyundai i20, 14 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | 1042 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 126 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i20 (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |