Kia Picanto 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Picanto engine produces 56 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Picanto consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Picanto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Picanto can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia Picanto version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Vitara, Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine Suzuki Swift 2018 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM. However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Swift 2018 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 30 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.8 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Swift has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Picanto, so Suzuki Swift quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |