Kia Picanto 2017 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is more dynamic to drive. Kia Picanto engine produces 24 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Picanto can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia Picanto version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | 959 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 4 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |