Kia Picanto 2017 vs Hyundai i10 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is more dynamic to drive. Kia Picanto engine produces 18 HP more power than Hyundai i10, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i10 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i10 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai i10 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10 | Used also on Kia Picanto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | 1046 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 3 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i10. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i10 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai i10 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |