Kia Picanto 2017 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 1 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 31 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | 883 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 45 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 127 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |