Kia Picanto 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 9 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
870 litres | 959 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Picanto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`400 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 855 kg | 929 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 361 kg | |
| Kia Picanto load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem more than Skoda Citigo. Therefore, Kia Picanto is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |