Kia Picanto 2015 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 66 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 14 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai i10 | Used also on Nissan Note | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.60 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | no data | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 65 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`425 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |