Kia Picanto 2011 vs Opel Adam 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Adam, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Adam. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Adam is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Adam gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 10 cm shorter than the Opel Adam, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | 663 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Picanto has 30 litres more trunk space than the Opel Adam. The Opel Adam may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Adam (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Adam scores higher in safety tests, butKia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Adam scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Opel Adam has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Adam, so Opel Adam quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Opel Adam has
| |