Kia Picanto 2010 vs Suzuki Splash 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Splash is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 29 HP less power than Suzuki Splash, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Suzuki Splash. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Kia Picanto consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai i10 | Used also on Opel Agila | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 17 cm shorter than the Suzuki Splash, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 157 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Suzuki Splash has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 21 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |