Kia Picanto 2010 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 62 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Splash is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 3 HP less power than Suzuki Splash, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Suzuki Splash. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Splash gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Alto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Splash might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 17 cm shorter than the Suzuki Splash, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 157 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Suzuki Splash has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 21 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |