Kia Picanto 2010 vs Kia Picanto 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 62 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto 2011 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto 2010 engine produces 7 HP less power than Kia Picanto 2011, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Kia Picanto 2011. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Picanto 2011 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto 2010 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto 2011, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto 2010 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto 2010 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto 2011. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Picanto 2011 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto 2011 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto 2011 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Picanto 2011 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Picanto 2010 is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto 2011, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 157 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
|
Kia Picanto 2011 has more luggage space. Kia Picanto 2010 has 43 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto 2010 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Picanto 2011, which means Kia Picanto 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |