Kia Picanto 2007 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 4 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai i10 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 157 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 18 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |