Kia Picanto 2005 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Diesel | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
| Kia Picanto engine produces 12 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Suzuki Alto. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Picanto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 157 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |