Kia Picanto 2004 vs Chevrolet Matiz 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 97 NM | 87 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
Kia Picanto engine produces 1 HP more power than Chevrolet Matiz, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Chevrolet Matiz. Despite the higher power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Picanto consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Matiz. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
500 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Kia Picanto and Chevrolet Matiz are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
882 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Matiz. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 795 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Matiz has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Chevrolet Matiz has
| |