Kia Picanto 2004 vs Suzuki Alto 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 85 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
| Kia Picanto engine produces 2 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Despite the higher power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai i10 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Picanto might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
882 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |