Kia Picanto 2004 vs Suzuki Alto 2002

 
Kia Picanto
2004 - 2007
Suzuki Alto
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.1 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 62 HP63 HP
Torque: 86 NM85 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.3 seconds14.8 seconds
Suzuki Alto is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Picanto engine produces 1 HP less power than Suzuki Alto, but torque is 1 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway870 km on highway
560 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Alto engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years11 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Alto might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.50 m3.50 m
Width: 1.60 m1.48 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Kia Picanto and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 220 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
882 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters9.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`340no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki Alto has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv