Kia Picanto 2004 vs Hyundai Atos 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 62 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Atos is a more dynamic driving. Kia Picanto engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai Atos, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Hyundai Atos. Due to the lower power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos, which means that by driving the Kia Picanto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Picanto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Hyundai Getz | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Atos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.57 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Atos, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Picanto is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
882 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai Atos, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Atos has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Atos, so Hyundai Atos quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |