Kia Picanto 2015 vs Chevrolet Spark 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 66 - 85 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 95 - 120 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 14.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.6 | 7.1 | |
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Spark. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.60 m | 3.64 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Picanto is 4 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 313 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | 771 litres | |
Kia Picanto has 113 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 99 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`415 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |