Kia Picanto 2011 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 26 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | no data | |
| Kia Picanto has 4 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |