Kia Picanto 2011 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Picanto is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | 774 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 71 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Alto (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Kia Picanto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Alto is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Picanto scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |