Kia Picanto 2015 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol, lPG) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 - 85 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 120 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 14.6 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.6 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Kia Picanto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`415 | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |