Kia Picanto 2011 vs Toyota Aygo 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 14.2 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.5 - 4.6 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 18 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | 782 litres | |
| Kia Picanto has 61 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`185 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests, but Toyota Aygo is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |