Kia Picanto 2011 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 65 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Kia Picanto can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |