Kia Picanto 2011 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia Picanto is 45 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 88 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Kia RIO has
| |