Kia Picanto 2011 vs Honda Jazz 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 69 - 85 HP | 90 - 99 HP | |
Torque: | 94 - 120 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | 11 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.9 | 5.3 | |
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.60 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 31 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 428 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
605 litres | 1396 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Kia Picanto has 228 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 791 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`335 | ~ 1`510 | |
Safety: | |||
The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |