Kia Optima 2000 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP180 HP
Torque: 180 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Optima engine produces 44 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.710.0
Kia Optima consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway920 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower.
Kia Optima is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 479 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity.
Kia Optima has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9852`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data2800
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv