Kia Optima 2000 vs Volvo S60 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Optima engine produces 44 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.0 | |
Kia Optima consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Kia Optima has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |