Kia Optima 2005 vs Chrysler Sebring 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 305 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Kia Optima and Chrysler Sebring have the same engine power, but Kia Optima torque is 5 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Kia Optima is smaller. Kia Optima is 12 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 394 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Optima has 102 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |