Kia Optima 2010 vs Kia Optima 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 231 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Kia Optima 2010 engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Optima 2013, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Kia Optima 2013. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Optima 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Kia Optima 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Kia Optima 2013 has more luggage space. Kia Optima 2010 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima 2013. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima 2010 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Optima 2013. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia Optima has
| |